The Pentacon Six System
by TRA

Pentacon Six Lenses

The Kilfitt Multi-Kilar converter
 

This report is long, but is, I believe, worth reading, as it contains information that I have not found anywhere on the internet nor in any other publication, but have only discovered gradually over years of detective work and searching worldwide for suitable adapters and lenses.


 
The Kilfitt Multi-Kilar Converter
[Multi_Kilar_01.jpg]

The Kilfitt Multi-Kilar is a lens converter, as in “2× converter”, etc., but it is much more than that!

“It’s a converter, Jim, but not as we know it!” 1

It looks unlike any 2× converter that you have probably seen:


[Multi_Kilar_02.jpg]

According to Pont’s book (here), Kilfitt announced the Multi-Kilar in 1959.  Do not expect it to connect to any lens that is not from Kilfitt, and it won’t even connect to all of them.  Before we can use it, we need various connectors, depending on which camera we wish to use, and which lenses.  These connectors are now generally extremely hard to find.
(
1Star Trek fans may recognise an allusion to a phrase attributed to Mr Spock – at least, in the 1987 hit song by the British band The Firm, “Star Trekkin’ Across the Universe”.)

    

[Multi_Kilar_03.jpg]
The Multi-Kilar is a tube that is 711/16" / 197mm long – in its unextended form!


[Multi_Kilar_04.jpg]
Extended, it is 1011/16" / 270mm long to the rear flange of the mount locking ring.  It is in fact a variable or zoom converter covering the range from 2× to a whole four times (4×) the focal length of the unconverted lens.
  


[Multi_Kilar_11.jpg]

On the right-hand side of the Multi-Kilar there is a crank handle.  As we turn this clockwise, the front of the converter extends.  It first stops at 2½× – although one could stop at any point before this.  As we continue turning the crank, we find that there are détentes also at 3×, 3½× and 4×  These settings are marked in white on the barrel, with the word “FOCAL”, referring to the multiplication factor of the focal length of the lens that is being used with the Multi-Kilar.

As we crank out the converter, we can see the image in the viewfinder getting darker, which is an unavoidable consequence of extending the length of the converter and increasing the conversion strength.  For those who do not have through-the-lens metering (which was extremely rare when the Multi-Kilar was introduced), Kilfitt marks exposure factors in red on the barrel of the Multi-Kilar.  These factors are indicated with the word “STOPS”, meaning the number of f/ stops by which one needs to open up the lens.  Each full f/ stop is equivalent to one shutter speed position on most of the cameras for which the Multi-Kilar was designed.

As one changes the conversion factor, one also needs to adjust the focus, by turning the ring near the front of the Multi-Kilar, which is also visible in the image to the right here.


[Multi_Kilar_05.jpg]

Heinz Kilfitt was keen to provide a filter drawer near the back of his lenses, when possible.  A small gelatin filter of one’s choice could be placed in this removable drawer, which was then re-inserted into the barrel of the lens.  The Multi-Kilar has just such a filter drawer, and here we see several views of it.  (Readers should beware of used Kilfitt lenses for which the filter drawer has been lost, leaving a large gap in the barrel of the lens, through which so much light will enter that the lens will be unusable unless the opening is covered.)


[Multi_Kilar_07.jpg]
Here we can see the filter drawer partially raised.  It will come out completely for the filter to be fitted into it.  The large gap left in the barrel when it is removed is easy to see in this picture.

[Multi_Kilar_08.jpg]
This close-up rear view shows the Multi-Kilar with a “WESI” camera mount and the filter drawer in place (although it does not currently have a filter gelatin in it).

[Multi_Kilar_09.jpg]
Here the filter drawer has been removed, for comparison purposes.  As already explained, the drawer must be replaced (with or without a filter) before the lens can be used.

Using the Multi-Kilar

The Multi-Kilar has to be mounted between the camera body and the lens.  Kilfitt made his lenses available for the widest-possible range of 35mm and Medium Format cameras of his day, and therefore most lenses have an interchangeable camera mount on the back.  The Multi-Kilar does of course need a camera mount on the back, but  – depending on the lens that one wishes to use with it – it may also need a mount on the front.


[Multi_Kilar_10.jpg]
Here we can see the rear of this Multi-Kilar, this time with the WESI camera mount removed.  We note that on this particular example the WE base is screwed to the converter with four screws.  I do not know if some Kilfitt lenses had the WE base permanently mounted on the lens.  We do not need to remove these screws.

The WESI mount has a Praktisix / Pentacon Six mount on the back and a 70mm thread on the front (Pont, page 38).  A captive locking ring on WE base on the Multi-Kilar itself will engage with this thread.  First, align the spike/pin in the WE base that is on the Multi-Kilar (marked “A” in this photo) with the circular slot in the WESI (marked “B”), then turn the ring to hold the mount firmly into place.

[Multi_Kilar_12.jpg]
The front of the Multi-Kilar (at least, this one) has a 39mm Leica-compatible screw thread socket.

Kilfitt Codes

You may recall (from here) that Pont reports three different types of bases on the rear of Kilfitt lenses:

  • KI
  • AN
  • WE

(in chronological order of their introduction).

A Kilfitt expert tells me that to understand the codes for Kilfitt adapters, it is helpful to imagine that you have the lens to the left and the camera to the right.  So if you have a lens that has a WE base and you want to connect it to a Praktisix or Pentacon Six, for which the Kilfitt code is SI, the adapter that you will need is called a WESI.  This technique for understanding Kilfitt codes works with most Kilfitt mounts, but a few of the component codes were combined in the opposite order!

In our case, at the camera end we want to mount the Multi-Kilar onto a Pentacon Six, and the rear of this Multi-Kilar has a WE base, so we can achieve this easily with a Kilfitt WESI mount.

That was the easy bit.  We can now mount the Multi-Kilar onto the camera.  The other end is far more complicated.

“KI” lenses

Pont refers to the “KI” code as being “like Kilar”.  I am going to guess something different.  As far as I can see from the extremely limited numbers of Kilfitt lenses that I have handled, the “KI” lenses were destined for cameras that used 35mm film.  This was a film format that was designed for the cinema (“KINO” in German).  We recall that the first 35mm SLR was from Exakta in Dresden and because of the film it used, it was called the KINE Exakta.  So I surmise that “KI” may have stood for “KINE”, or at least have been inspired by this naming history.  Kilfitt’s early lenses were advertised for the 35mm Exakta cameras, as well as for other brands.

We should also bear in mind that in the early 1950s, the other major market for Kilfitt was 35mm non-reflex cameras, principally the Leica.  Focussing long lenses accurately with a non-reflex camera was difficult, and in the 1930s Zeiss had designed a mirror box for the Contax that went between the camera body and long lenses.  This essentially converted the rangefinder camera into a “single-lens-reflex”, although only for use with long lenses that had been manufactured with a short back, to allow space for a mirror box.  Leica produced similar mirror boxes, and so did Novoflex.

In the 1950s, Kilfitt manufactured such mirror boxes, and lenses that screwed into the front of them.  With Leica being the main market for these lenses and mirror boxes, Kilfitt put a 39mm Leica male screw mount on the rear of the box and a 39mm Leica female screw mount on the front of the mirror box.  (Naturally, if one mounted a standard Leica lens onto the front of this box, the lens would not focus to infinity, but might be usable for extreme macro work, another area where non-reflex cameras could only work with extreme difficulty (both for focussing and framing).  The Kilfitt mirror boxes were called “Spiegelkasten”.  (We need to know this later!)

The image to the right reproduces a Kilfitt mirror box.  Pressing the lever down raised the mirror and the end of the lever then pressed down onto the camera shutter button to fire the shutter.  Pont shows four different types of mirror boxes from Kilfitt, with names such as “Kilarflex”, “Repriskop” and “Kilarskop”.  For those wishing to know more about Kilfitt, Pont’s book is an essential source.

Pont states that “KI” lenses covered 35mm format only (24mm × 36mm), not “6 × 6” format.  However, if a lens that was designed to cover 35mm format is mounted on bellows (for macro work) or on a 2× converter, the image that is enlarged in either of these ways may well cover 6×6 format.  We shall see.

Now let us return to our Multi-Kilar.  At the front it has a 39mm Leica female screw mount.  It may be that if we screw into the front of the Multi-Kilar some of Kilfitt’s long lenses with the “KI” Leica thread mount, they will work!

Here, I will try it with the 150mm f/3.5 Kilfitt Tele-Kilar in 39mm mount, which I risked buying, without knowing if it would be compatible.


[kmbox.jpg]
From Pont, page 88

150mm f/3.5 Kilfitt Tele-Kilar


[MK_w_150_01.jpg]

This lens screws directly into the 39mm socket on the front of the Multi-Kilar.  We then need to mount this onto an extremely sturdy tripod, and to add a Pentacon Six on the back.  The result?  Perfect infinity focus!  And in the viewfinder we seem to have coverage of the whole of the 6 × 6 format with the minimum 2 × converter setting.  The actual coverage is clear from the test shots reproduced below.

As the Multi-Kilar is a 2× to 4× converter, with every conversion factor in between, with this 150mm Tele-Kilar, we can easily achieve the following focal lengths:



This lens is reportedly designed to cover only 35mm format, not 6 × 6, and it will not even achieve infinity focus on the Pentacon Six (except perhaps with a custom-made extension tube?).  However, when mounted on the Multi-Kilar it does cover Medium Format.

Lens
Converter factor
Resultant
Focal Length
150mm Tele-Kilar [with no converter
 – but not on the Pentacon Six!]
150mm

2 × 300mm

2½ × 375mm

3 × 450mm

3½ × 525mm

4 × 600mm

“Oh, there is just one other thing ...”


A Multi-Kilar image as seen in the viewfinder
[C567_4_MacZm_MK3or.jpg]

As we look through the viewfinder, we find that using the Multi-Kilar is not for the faint-hearted: with our reflex camera and pentaprism, the image is upside-down!  That can’t be changed.  That’s the way it is.  When we get the prints (or scan the film), we just need to turn them through 180 degrees.  Problem solved!  But at the shooting stage, it takes some getting used to, and may account for the fact that when taking this picture I failed to notice that the subject was not exactly vertical.

300mm f/5.6 Kilfitt Tele-Kilar


The 300mm Tele-Kilar mounted on the Multi-Kilar, with the “Rezwi” extension ring in place between the two components
[MK_w_300_01.jpg]


I recently managed to buy the 300mm Tele-Kilar with M39 mount.  Would it focus to infinity with the Pentacon Six when mounted on the Multi-Kilar, and totally cover the format?  The vendor was not likely to know the answer to this question, so I took another risk and bought it.

When I screwed it into the front of the Multi-Kilar on my Pentacon Six, I was surprised and disappointed!  No infinity focus!  I turned the focussing ring on the Tele-Kilar, and when the barrel was extended about 15mm, I suddenly got infinity focus!  So it works, but the close-focussing potential is extremely reduced.

I went back to the 150mm Tele-Kilar, above, and found that on its back there was an extension ring that I could remove.  It bore the name “Rezwi”.

I put this ring onto the back of the 300mm Tele-Kilar and re-mounted it on the Multi-Kilar.  The result?  Perfect infinity focus!  And in the viewfinder we seem to have coverage of the whole of the 6 × 6 format with the minimum 2 × converter setting.  Test shots show that the coverage on the Pentacon Six is excellent (see results below).

With the 300mm Tele-Kilar and the Multi-Kilar, we can easily achieve the following focal lengths:

Lens
Converter factor
Resultant
Focal Length
300mm Tele-Kilar [with no converter
 – but not on the Pentacon Six!]
300mm

2 × 600mm

2½ × 750mm

3 × 900mm

3½ × 1050mm

4 × 1200mm

More on the “REZWI” Extension Ring

I checked in Pont’s book.  He says (in French, of course), that the REZWI is “a 39/39 ring 14.5mm thick giving to recent Kilfitt reflex boxes (see above) the same mounting distance between the lens and the film plane as the old reflex boxes.” (p. 101)  Nothing there about the Multi-Kilar, but that is another place where it is invaluable.

Using the 150mm and 300mm Tele-Kilars on 35mm cameras

I recently bought a box of assorted Kilfitt accessories.  Among them I found an adapter that had a 39mm female thread labelled “KIL” on the front and a 42mm male thread labelled “PA” on the back.  I screwed my 150mm Tele-Kilar into the front and mounted a Praktica VLC2 35mm camera on the back.  Infinity focus?  Impossible, at any setting!  I looked at the lens, and saw that there was a ring at the back that I could remove.  I unscrewed it and found that it bore the name “Rezwi”.  I then mounted the lens back on the M39-M42 adapter, without the “Rezwi”.  Result?  Perfect infinity focus on the 35mm camera!

Checking with the 300mm Tele-Kilar, I got the same result: with the “Rezwi” between the lens and the 35mm camera, infinity focus was impossible, without it, infinity focus was achieved with the lens set on the infinity position.

The rule is:
Add the “Rezwi” to obtain infinity focus with these lenses on the Multi-Kilar;
Remove the “Rezwi” to obtain infinity focus with these lenses on a 35mm camera, via the Kilfitt M39-M42 adapter.



The Rezwi extension ring.
In German, the word “zwischen” means “between” and Germans use the term “Zwischenringe” for what we in English normally call “extension tubes”.

[rezwi_01.jpg]

Here are pictures of these two lenses on a 35mm (“full frame”) camera, via the Kilfitt M39-M42 adapter.


[k150_M42.jpg]


[k300_M42.jpg]

We can see that the 39mm-M42 Kilfitt adapter has the following features:
  • a tripod foot with ¼" and 3/8" sockets
  • a filter drawer for gelatine filters.

Note that we have removed the “Rezwi” extension ring before mounting these lenses onto the M39-M42 Kilfitt adapter.

“AN” lenses

Now let’s try to connect a lens with an AN mount system to the Multi-Kilar.  This is not so straight-forward.

The “AN” lens that we have is the fabulous Pan-Tele Kilar, which is reported on here.  It came to us with the mount for the Pentacon Six.  I thought that the mount should be called “ANSI”, but my one is marked “ANSIX” on an inner surface.  Pont says that the ANSIX is the adapter for PANTE/Praktisix.  “PANTE” is the code for the 300mm f/4 Pan Tele Kilar with AN base.  To remove this mount from the base, one unscrews a large retaining ring.  Unlike with the WE base, the AN mount has the ring as part of the mount, so it comes off with the mount, instead of staying on the lens.

Now we need something to connect an AN base to a 39mm Leica mount socket.  We might guess “ANKI”, based on our guesses about “KI”, above, but we would be wrong.  “ANKI” does not appear to be a Kilfitt code.  But as the 39mm socket was used on the front of the Kilfitt mirror box (SPIegelkasten), the mount is called “ANSPI”.

A reliable and knowledgeable Kilfitt collector in Germany tells me that there are various solutions:

  • An ANWE, which converts the AN base to a WE base, then a WEKI.  You can see more on the WEKI below.
  • An ANSIC, which converts certain AN base lenses to a Kilfitt mirror box.  One must then fix a MUZWI to the ANSIC.
  • Or an ANSPI.


The Pan Tele Kilar with its ANSIX mount
[PTK_w_ANSIX.jpg]

The ANSIX camera mount unscrewed from the back of the Pan Tele Kilar
[ANSIX_3_qutr.jpg]

So we need to locate an ANSPI (or a suitable combination of two other adapters).  The ANSPI was the first of these that we found.


[ANSPI_3-qutr.jpg]

It contains a filter drawer, which can be pulled out of the top of the adapter.  We are now only half way there. 

From the back we can see the light trap at the top of the filter drawer.
[ANSPI_back.jpg]

From the front we get a partial view of the filter holder.
[ANSPI_front.jpg]

Present the ANSPI to the AN base.  It fits perfectly.  But there is a problem.  The locking ring was part of the ANSIX mount, and the ANSPI is supplied without a locking ring.

“Easy!” you say.  “Remove the locking ring from the ANSIX.”  No, it is not easy.  The ring is captive to the ANSIX mount.  Someone has tried to remove a screw within the ANSIX to disassemble the mount, but has only succeeded in damaging the screw head.  We need to find a fairly WIDE screw driver with a FINE blade, to proceed firmly, and to make sure that nothing slips.  After a struggle, we remove four screws with slightly rusty threads that have probably not been turned since the ANSIX was assembled in the Kilfitt factory more than sixty years ago.  The front and the back of the ANSIX come apart.  Now we can retrieve the locking ring.



Back of ANSIX locking ring
[ANSIX_ring_back.jpg]

Front of ANSIX locking ring
[ANSIX_ring_front.jpg]

Here we can see that the ANSIX locking ring is very slim.
[ANSIX_ring_01.jpg]


The ANSPI sitting on top of the AN base on the Pan Tele Kilar.
We have here partially pulled out the filter drawer that is in the mount.

[PTK_w_ANSPI_presented.jpg]
We will not be swapping over these adapters in the field.  Either we will take out the Pan-Tele Kilar with the ANSIX mount and use it directly on the Pentacon Six, as in the past, OR we will swap the ANSIX mount for the ANSPI mount before we set out, and use the Pan-Tele Kilar only on the Multi-Kilar.  (Of course, if we could find an ANWE, which converts the AN base to a WE base, we could leave that on the Pan-Tele Kilar and easily swap between a WESI back for the Pentacon Six or a WEKI back for the Pan-Tele Kilar, even out in the field.)

To our surprise, the ANSIX locking ring fits the ANSPI perfectly – once we have removed the filter drawer that is built into it.  We now present the ANSPI to the back of the Pan-Tele-Kilar, turn the locking ring and then re-insert the filter drawer, without which light would get into the mount, seriously degrading the image.


[PTK_w_ANSPI_mounted.jpg]
    
Now we screw the rear of the ANSPI into the front of the Multi-Kilar.  Another perfect fit!  There is no locating pin system with the AN mount, so we may need to slacken off the locking ring slightly and re-align the Pan Tele Kilar to get the focussing scales and aperture register index to the top of the lens, then re-tighten.


[PTK_on_Multi_Kilar.jpg]


Pan Tele Kilar and Multi-Kilar mounted onto a Pentacon Six
[PTK_MK_P6_01.jpg]


Now we can put our Pentacon Six back onto the Multi-Kilar and mount everything onto an exceptionally sturdy tripod – my luggage scales give the total weight of this combination as 2.7 kg, which an internet converter indicates is 5 lb 15¼ oz – and that is without a camera!  When we add a Pentacon Six with metering prism (and at the moment no film loaded!), the same scales indicate a total weight of 4.3 kg, equivalent to 9 lb 7.678 oz, according to the same internet source.  You won’t be walking around with this hung around your neck!  In fact, Kilfitt recommends the use of TWO tripods, which is fine if one is photographing something that is not moving – or perhaps birds or squirrels visiting a feeding table.

This is facilitated by the presence of THREE tripod mount points on the converter, and of course also a tripod mount on the Pan Tele Kilar.

There are four ¼" tripod sockets and four 3/8" sockets.

[PTK_on_Multi-Kilar_base.jpg]

In fact, with the Multi-Kilar set at 4× conversion and the Pan Tele Kilar at maximum extension for closest focus, the total length (without a camera!) is approximately 600 mm or 24 inches.  One can readily see why a tripod is essential.


[PTK_on_Multi_Kilar_size.jpg]

One can also readily understand why some of the most important purchasers of Kilfitt and Zoomar lenses were the Disney organisation and the U.S. Military.  Disney is reported to have used Kilfitt lenses when filming wildlife documentaries for U.S. television in the 1950s and 60s.  Disney and the U.S. military were clearly not concerned by the size and weight of these super-powerful lenses, and would of course have used them on a tripod, possibly in a wildlife photographic hide or other concealed site in the case of military use.  In either situation, the users were prepared to spend hours or even days set up and ready for when the right event occurred.  This is not the situation of most amateur users of this equipment.

With the 300mm Pan-Tele-Kilar and the Multi-Kilar, we can easily achieve the following focal lengths:

Lens Converter factor Resultant
focal length
300mm Pan-Tele-Kilar [with no converter] 300mm

2 × 600mm

2½ × 750mm

3 × 900mm

3½ × 1050mm

4 × 1200mm

“WE” lenses

“WE” was the last of the connector systems developed by Kilfitt.  We have described it above, since the rear of our Multi-Kilar has a WE base.

But can we mount lenses with a WE base onto the FRONT of the Multi-Kilar?  The diameter of a Pentacon Six lens mount is much greater than the diameter of the 39mm hole in the front of the Multi-Kilar.  In any case, if we present an 80mm Biometar lens to the front of the Multi-Kilar, we discover that infinity focus is not possible, because we cannot get the Biometar far enough back.

What about the 90mm Kilfitt Makro-Kilar / Macro-Zoomatar?  This has a WE base and we have a WESI adapter on that base, for direct mounting onto the Pentacon Six, and that works perfectly.  To get the Makro-Kilar far enough back to enable infinity focus when it is on the Multi-Kilar, we will obviously need to remove the WESI adapter, but what will we put in its place?  Perhaps there is a “WESPI”, by analogy with the ANSPI.  It turns out that a “WESPI” adapter is reported.  Pont says that it was an adapter for mounting the SPOSO onto Kilfitt mirror boxes.  So what is a “SPOSO”?  It turns out to be the WE version of the 600mm f/5.6 Sport Fern Kilar / Sport Zoomatar.  These mount adapters need much more than the correct connector on each surface: they need to be the right THICKNESS to provide infinity focus, so this is probably not the right one for this lens.  In any case, we haven’t got a WESPI, so we can’t try it out.

Fortunately, a Kilfitt expert in Germany has told me that the correct adapter to mount the 90mm Makro Kilar / Macro Zoomatar is a WEKI – so there is that “KI” that I suspected of being derived from the 35mm format “KINE” cameras.


The WESI camera mount removed from the WE base on the lens.
[WESI_01.jpg]

This image gives an idea of the thickness of the WESI camera mount.
[WESI_side.jpg]

As expected, the WEKI is an extremely slim disk.  Its front edge has the filter thread for the locking ring on the WE base, and its rear end has the 39mm “Leica” male screw thread.  Attach the WEKI to the Makro-Kilar / Macro-Zoomatar.  The WEKI has five deep indentations on its front surface, so that the spike or pin in the WE base can be located in whichever indentation gets the lens correctly aligned with the focussing scale and the aperture index at the top.  Clever detail!
This ring came without a name on it.  I have added a label.
[WEKI_back.jpg]

Note locating points to facilitate alignment.
[WEKI_front.jpg]

The WEKI is clearly much slimmer than the WESI.
[WEKI_side.jpg]

Next, screw the rear end of the WEKI to the front of the Multi-Kilar.

Add the 90mm Makro Kilar / Macro Zoomatar, and it works!  Infinity focus (and closer) is available.


WEKI adapter screwed into front of Multi-Kilar ...
[MK_w_WEKI.jpg]

...  and with the Macro Zoomatar attached
[MK_w_WEKI_&_Macro_Zmtr.jpg]


The Macro Zoomatar mounted on the Multi-Kilar, via the WEKI ring
[Macro_Zmtr_MK_P6.jpg]

All ready to go!
[Macro_Zmtr_MK_p6.jpg]
So with the 90mm Makro-Kilar / Macro-Zoomatar, we can easily achieve the following focal lengths:

Lens
Converter factor
Resultant
focal length
90mm Makro-Kilar / Macro-Zoomatar  [with no converter] 90mm

2 × 180mm

2½ × 225mm

3 × 270mm

3½ × 315mm

4 × 360mm


Summary

To use the Multi-Kilar, the following options are available:

Lens Type

Adapter

Multi-Kilar

Kilfitt M39 lens
+ REZWI
+
Multi-Kilar

Kilfitt AN lens
+ ANSPI
+ Multi-Kilar
     Or Kilfitt AN lens
     minus mount

+ ANWE
+ WEKI
+ Multi-Kilar
     Or Kilfitt AN lens
     minus mount
+ ANSIC
+ MUZWI
+ Multi-Kilar This one not checked!
Kilfitt WE lens
+ WEKI
+ Multi-Kilar

Now to check on the quality.  We know that the Makro-Kilar / Macro-Zoomatar is superb, and so is the Pan-Tele Kilar, but we have not previously used the 150mm or 300mm Tele-Kilar.

Test results

Most of the test pictures in the first three columns were taken on two different dates, 9 days apart in April 2019, at approximately the same time of day.  However, this does account for some slight differences of lighting, colour and shadows between some pictures.  Further tests were taken in on various dates in July 2019, and the tests for the 300mm Tele-Kilar were made in November 2020.  Pentacon Six TL used for all shots.  Metering with Pentacon Six TTL metering pentaprism.  Fuji PRO 400H film used.  Click on the images in this section to see them larger.  With most browsers, a second click on the enlarged image will enlarge it still more.

Multi-Kilar setting
90mm Macro Zoomatar
150mm Tele-Kilar
300mm Pan-Tele Kilar
300mm Tele-Kilar
Lens used on its own without the Multi-Kilar

Focal length: 90mm
1/125 f/22  50cm further forward than rest of shots [C567_1-2_MacZms.jpg]
(It is not possible to use this lens on the Pentacon Six without the Multi-Kilar.)

Focal length: 300mm
1/250 f/11
[C568_11_PTKs.jpg]
(It is not possible to use this lens on the Pentacon Six without the Multi-Kilar.)










Resultant focal length: 180mm
1/125 f/8
[C567_3_MacZm_MK2s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 300mm
1/125 f/6.3
[C567_7_150TK_MK2s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 600mm
1/125 f/6.3
[C568_8-9_PTK_MK2s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 600mm
1/60 f/9.5

[C580_09_300TK_MK2s.jpg]








2.5×









Resultant focal length: 225mm
1/250 f/9.5
[C571_1_MacZm_MK2pt5s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 375mm
1/125 f/11
[C570_7_150TK_MK2pt5s.jpg]

Resultant focal length:750mm
1/250 f/8
[C570_9_PTK_MK2pt5s.jpg]

Resultant focal length:750mm
1/60 f/9.5
[C580_10_300TK_MK2pt5s.jpg]











Resultant focal length: 270mm
1/125 f/8
[C567_4_MacZm_MK3s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 450mm
1/125 f/5.6 (Under-exposed 1 stop)
[C567_9_150TK_MK3s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 900mm
1/125 f/5.6
[C567_16_PTK_MK3s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 900mm
1/60 f/8

[C580_12_300TK_MK3s.jpg]








3.5×


Resultant focal length: 315mm
1/250 f/8
(on a different occasion from previous picture)
[C570_12_MacZm_MK3pt5s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 525mm
1/60 f/5.6
[C567_10_150TK_MK3pt5s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 1050mm
1/250 f/5.6
[C570_10_PTK_MK3pt5s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 1050mm
1/60 f/6.3

[C580_13_300TK_MK3pt5s.jpg]










Resultant focal length: 360mm
1/60 f/5.6
[C567_6_MacZm_MK4s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 600mm
1/60 f/6.3
[C568_7_150TK_MK4s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 1200mm
1/60 f/5.6 (2/3 stop under-exposed)
[C568_10_PTK_MK4s.jpg]

Resultant focal length: 1200mm
1/30 f/6.3

[C580_15_300TK_MK4s.jpg]

For the purpose of comparison, here is a picture taken from the same position, using the 500mm Pentacon (Meyer-Optik Orestegor) lens “Made in Germany” (see here)

Focal length: 500mm
1/250 f/11
[C568_13_Pentacon.jpg]

The first shot in this series of test pictures (C567_1-2_MacZm.jpg) was hand-held.  All of the others were taken with the lens mounted on a tripod.  For film C567 (see the frame identifier under the description for each picture), the  Benro Mach3 TMA28C tripod was used, with legs fully extended, centre column down and the legs braced against heavy objects.  For film C568 and film C570, the Berlebach UNI 14 tripod was used.  In all cases except the hand-held shot, the Arca-Swiss B1-G Aspherical Ball Head was used.  See details of the Benro tripod here.  See details of the Berlebach tripod and the Arca-Swiss B1-G Ball Head, see here.  Naturally, the direction of the light source, including the height of the sun in the sky, and its intensity, varied from one occasion to another, although I chose situations where the lighting was as similar as possible.

Comments and Conclusions

First, it is necessary to make two general comments:
  1. In all cases where the Multi-Kilar converter was used, the shutter speeds that were needed in order to get a correct or nearly-correct exposure were incredibly slow, much slower than would normally be recommended for these long focal lengths  – even when using a tripod.  For instance, for a 1000mm lens, a shutter speed of 1/1000 sec would be recommended, but here with an effective 1200mm lens we used 1/60 sec!
  2. Every lens converter “gobbles up” light, and the greater the power of the converter, the more light is lost.  To get adequate exposure, on several occasions we had to use the 150mm Tele-Kilar and the 300mm Pan-Tele Kilar at wider-than normal apertures and on one occasion the Macro Zoomatar was used at f/5.6.  (Most lenses generally give of their best at f/8 or f/11.)
Ignoring these two considerations can result in images that are not as sharp as they might have been, either because of camera movement during the exposure or because of shallow depth-of-field and/or reduced sharpness at wide apertures (which is common with most lenses).


Multi-Kilar setting
90mm Macro Zoomatar
150mm Tele-Kilar
300mm Pan-Tele Kilar
300mm Tele-Kilar
Lens used on its own without the Multi-Kilar
Focal length: 90mm
I don’t often use this macro lens at or near its infinity setting, but it does an excellent job here, too!
Sharp, great resolution and no chromatic aberrations.
1/125 f/22
(It is not possible to use this lens on the Pentacon Six without the Multi-Kilar.) Focal length: 300mm
So this is what the fuss is all about with this lens!  What superb results!
This was on the tripod, but the lens could have been used hand-held at this shutter speed.
1/250 f/11

(It is not possible to use this lens on the Pentacon Six without the Multi-Kilar.)


Resultant focal length: 180mm
Very obvious vignetting in the top corners, but the image is still sharp and clear.
We might get away with this if we were shooting an animal against a dark background, but not against a bright sky.  (The vignetting is also present at the bottom of the frame, but less obvious because of the darker subject detail there.)
1/125 f/8

Resultant focal length: 300mm
Again, the same vignetting with the Multi-Kilar at the 2× setting.
The image is sharpest in the centre but softer nearer the edges.  A smaller aperture would probably have solved this, but at the cost of using a slower shutter speed.
1/125 f/6.3

Resultant focal length: 600mm
So this makes it “full house”: unacceptable vignetting of the image when the Multi-Kilar is at the 2× setting with all lenses tested.  In the case of the 90mm Macro Zoomatar and the 300mm Pan-Tele Kilar, the vignetting is obviously not caused by the main lens, which fully covers the 6×6 format without vignetting when used without the Multi-Kilar.
But when used with the Multi-Kilar, the image is still sharp, even with the widish aperture and slow shutter speed.
1/125 f/6.3

Resultant focal length: 600mm
As regards coverage, this is the best result with the Multi-Kilar, with a tiny amount of clearly-defined vignetting in the corners.  On the lab prints, less than 1mm of this could be seen in the top left corner.  The fact that we see a little more here probably indicates that I scanned beyond the intended image-forming area of the camera.
An excellent result!

1/60 f/9.5

2.5×
Resultant focal length: 225mm
This image is disappointing, even although it was shot on a cloudier day, which makes comparisons harder.
The hard corner vignetting at the 2× setting is gone, but there is clearly some fall-off in image brightness towards the corners.  It is also not as sharp as I would have expected.  I was using a new lightmeter, and perhaps I have under-exposed the negative.
1/250 f/9.5

Resultant focal length: 375mm
This reveals that when the Multi-Kilar is set to 2.5×, the vignetting seen at 2× magnification disappears.
Using the 150mm Tele-Kilar with the Multi-Kilar at 2.5× magnification results in sharp images that ably cover the full 6×6 format.
1/125 f/11
Resultant focal length:750mm
Again, the Multi-Kilar causes no vignetting when it is used at the 2.5× setting, this time with the Pan-Tele Kilar.  As we would expect with this lens, the image is sharp, even when used with the Multi-Kilar, a fact confirmed at other magnifications.
1/250 f/8
Resultant focal length:750mm
Another extremely sharp result!
The 300mm Tele-Kilar and the Multi-Kilar are clearly capable of superb image sharpness.
For the tests with this lens, I used very slow shutter speeds, trusting that the Berlebach tripod and Arca-Swiss B1-G head would hold the set-up rock steady, and they have not let me down – even though I did not use the camera’s mirror pre-release mechanism!
1/60 f/9.5



Resultant focal length: 270mm
With the Multi-Kilar at the 3× setting, there is no more vignetting.  This image is not as sharp as I would have liked, perhaps because of the slower than desirable shutter speed.
1/125 f/8

Resultant focal length: 450mm
A lovely, sharp image from the 150mm Tele-Kilar with the Multi-Kilar, in spite of the relatively large aperture used.
1/125 f/5.6 (Under-exposed 1 stop)
Resultant focal length: 900mm
What a fantastic result!  Sharp, contrasty and clear, in spite of the largish aperture and the slow shutter speed for the effective focal length.  The depth of field is inevitably shallow.
1/125 f/5.6

Resultant focal length: 900mm
At normal degrees of enlargement, this is very satisfactory, but massive enlargement reveals that there is slightly less sharpness than in the previous image.  This I put down to fractional focussing error.
1/60 f/8 (½ stop under-exposed)


3.5×

Resultant focal length: 315mm
This image is acceptably sharp at normal degrees of enlargement, while not matching results with the Pan-Tele Kilar.  However, an advisable minimum shutter speed would have been 1/500 sec and here we have used 1/250 sec, so that could be a factor.
1/250 f/8
Resultant focal length: 525mm
The bricks are sharp, but the chimney pots and the roof tiles are less sharp (and of course the depth of field is very shallow).  If only we could have shot with the lens at f/8, but using a shutter speed of 1/30 sec to compensate would be asking for trouble (camera movement during the exposure, even when using a tripod).
1/60 f/5.6

Resultant focal length: 1050mm
Another sharp image, as we would expect.  However, we observe the fully-to-be-expected shallow depth of field at this focal length with such a wide aperture, and the rear television aerial is not as sharp as the rest of the image.  To extend the depth of field, we would need to use a smaller aperture.
1/250 f/5.6
Resultant focal length: 1050mm
Again less sharp than desired.  With the camera quite high on a big tripod, I didn’t use the angle finder, or magnifier head, both of which can help with focussing, so I should have used the flip-up magnifying attachment, which magnifies the central area of the focussing screen 2.7×.
1/60 f/6.3


Resultant focal length: 360mm
The bricks are sharp, with a reduction in sharpness away from the centre.  Again, a smaller aperture would probably have solved this.
1/60 f/5.6

Resultant focal length: 600mm
This is not as sharp as I would have liked, but I believe that the cause has been the slow shutter speed.  No wonder Kilfitt recommend the use of two tripods with the Multi-Kilar!
1/60 f/6.3

Resultant focal length: 1200mm
Another superb result from the Pan-Tele Kilar with the Multi-Kilar!  What a great lens!
Compare with the first image in this series (with the 90mm Macro Zoomatar) to see just how much this combination brings a small detail in close.
1/60 f/5.6 (2/3 stop under-exposed)

Resultant focal length: 1200mm
Good sharpness, but there is some flare in the top half of the image, especially noticeable on the left-hand side.  The source of this is a mystery.  This image needs re-shooting.
1/30 f/6.3

The 500mm Pentacon (Meyer-Optik Orestegor) lens “Made in Germany”
Focal length: 500mm
The Meyer-Optik Orestegor lenses (300mm and 500mm) deliver superb results – and using them, one does not have an upside-down image in the viewfinder, nor do we need to use a converter that “eats up” the light.  They do not bear the name “Zeiss” (and they don’t have an automatic aperture), but they do deliver outstanding results easily.  (See further results with the 500mm “Pentacon” lens here and here.)
1/250 f/11



Conclusion?  The Multi-Kilar can deliver superb results, at least with magnifications between 3× and 4×, and also at 2× with the 300mm Tele-Kilar.  It is also the only converter in the Pentacon Six mount that offers these magnifications.  However, in most lighting situations, film with a speed of at least 400 ASA / 27 DIN is required, and (subject to other characteristics of the film, such as grain), a faster film would be preferable, to enable the use of smaller apertures and faster shutter speeds.  All four prime lenses used with the Multi-Kilar in these tests have also shown that they are capable of superb results.

To go on to the next lens data section, click below.
Novoflex lenses

To go to the beginning of the lenses section, click here.

To go to back to the data on Kilfitt lenses, click here.

To choose other options, click below.
Home

© TRA March 2019  Latest revision: March 2023