The Pentacon Six System
by TRA

Pentacon Six or Norita?

What is the right name for this camera?

Norita bodies bear no faceplate name, although on the back are the words “NORITA KOGAKU MADE IN JAPAN”.  The two types of prism and the waist-level finder bear the logo “NORITA” or (in the USA) “GRAFLEX NORITA”.  However, boxes and some literature bear the logo “NORITA 66” or “GRAFLEX NORITA 66”.

Pentacon Six or Norita?

One question I have been repeatedly asked is, “Should I buy a Pentacon Six or a Norita?”  In fact, I asked myself this question in the 1970s.

How do these two camera systems compare?

The Norita was  designed on the same principles as the Pentacon Six: to be a 6 × 6 (2¼ square) Medium Format camera that handled like a 35mm SLR.  In fact, some would claim that it was inspired by – or even copied from – the Pentacon Six and Praktisix, which had first appeared about 13 years earlier (Praktisix 1957, Norita, early 1970s).  However, its supporters would claim that the design of the Norita was an improvement on the Pentacon Six.  Let us compare them.

The bodies


The similarities between the Pentacon Six and the Norita 66 (marketed in the USA as “Graflex Norita”) are obvious in this picture.

The shape of the plain prism seems closely inspired by the Pentacon Six plain prism – although there are constraints on the possible shape of any pentaprism!

Note the absence of a delayed-action lever on the Norita.

The “third foot” that you can see under the Pentacon Six in the photo to the left here was supplied with the carrying cradle for the Exakta 66.  That can be seen here:

This locking bolt is in fact a little too long for the Pentacon Six, as the rubber covering on the other two “feet” of the Exakta 66 makes them thicker than the two spool retaining knobs of the Pentacon Six (see item 14 here:  A careful look at the photo here and lower down on this page shows that the two spool retaining knobs are not quite touching the surface on which the camera is standing, and there is a shadow under them.

Some people have found a suitable knob from the top of a tripod or from a camera case that is not needed.  However, I am not aware that Pentacon ever made an accessory expressly designed for this function.

The Norita was originally marketed as the Rittreck (or Warner Rittreck in the USA), but apart from a few cosmetic details (difference of name plate, chrome instead of black standard lens), this was essentially the same as the Norita.  It was very much in the style of the 1970s Japanese 35mm SLRs, and included some improvements on the Praktisix/Pentacon Six:

There were, however, a couple of other minus points:

The top plate of the Norita follows very much the layout standard on 35mm SLRs at the time.

One innovation in the Norita: the orange triangle at the right-hand end of the top plate points to a dial on the side that enables the user to engage a double-exposure facility, so that it is possible to cock the shutter without advancing the film.

To operate this correctly, it is also necessary to move a lever at the other end of the top plate, so that the counter doesn’t advance. The user must remember to return both controls to the Normal position after use!

The viewfinders

Most Noritas seem to have been sold with a non-metering prism, although by the late 1970s (approximately ten years later than for the Pentacon Six TL!) a metering prism appeared.


This had one major advantage, compared to the Pentacon Six, and three disadvantages.

The advantage was that it was coupled to the shutter speed control of the camera (but not to the aperture of the lenses!).

The disadvantages were:

[C356-37: Especially from behind, the Norita 66 with metering prism looks enormous compared with the Pentacon Six.
It also weighs a lot more!]

The lenses

The good news was:

The bad news was:
The range of lenses was extremely limited.  The Norita never really took off in the market place, and, up until January 2016 I was only aware of just one lens produced by a third-party manufacturer in the Norita mount: Zoomar’s 170 – 320mm f/4 lens.  Apart from this, users were restricted to the limited range produced by Norita Kogaku of Japan.  The following lenses were offered by them:
Focal Length Aperture Range Elements / Groups Closest Focus Filter Size Weight
40mm f/4 – f/22 9 / 8 1 ft (0.3m) 77mm × 0.75 22.5 oz (640g)
55mm f/4 – f/22 9 / 9 1.5 ft (0.45m) 62mm × 0.75 13.75 oz (390g)
80mm f/2 – f/22 6 / 4 3 ft (0.85m) 62mm × 0.75 15.5 oz (440g)
160mm f/4 – f/22 6 / 5 7 ft (2m) 62mm × 0.75 23 oz (650g)
240mm f/4 – f/22 6 / 5 12 ft (3.5m) 77mm × 0.75 40.5 oz (1150g)
400mm f/4.5 – f/22 6 / 7 21 ft (6m) 95mm × 0.75 80 oz (2300g)

The 400mm lens was advertised by a German supplier in 1975/6 but is not listed in most Norita literature that I have, although I have found reference to it in a recently-acquired brochure.  In June 2006 one of these lenses was sold on eBay for US$966.56 (approx EUR 750.00) – not within the price range of most amateurs for a rarely-used lens (unless one specialises in wildlife photography or various types of sports photography).  Another one of these lenses was sold on eBay in February 2010 for US$799 (approx Eur 584.45 or GBP510.74).

In addition, a very interesting special lens was produced for the Norita 66: a 70mm lens with built-in leaf shutter.  This enabled flash sync at all speeds.  Details are as follows:

Focal Length Aperture Range Elements / Groups Closest Focus Filter Size Weight
70mm f/3.5 – f/22 7 / 5 2.7 ft (0.8m) 77m × 0.75 34 oz (980g)

For all other lenses, the X setting on the shutter speed dial is selected.  This provides a nominal 1/40 sec sync, fractionally faster than on the Praktisix and Pentacon Six.

At the time that I was looking at the Norita (mid-to-late 1970s), none of the lenses was multi-coated.  However, Selmar Meents in Holland e-mailed me in December 2005 saying:

“I have owned two multicoated 40mm lenses for the Norita 66. These lenses were marked as such and the focusing ring was covered with diamond grid rubber as opposed to the metal focusing rings of the single coated version.
“Other owners have reported that they owned MC 240mm and MC 55mm lenses. These lenses were probably made in small numbers at the end of the production period of the Norita 66 system and are very rare.”
In fact, in 2006 I acquired a 160mm Noritar that is labelled “MC” and has the same type of diamond grid rubber focussing ring.  I have also seen a picture of an 80mm Noritar MC, which therefore accounts for all of the lenses other than the 70mm leaf-shutter lens and the rare 400mm lens.

The British photographic journal “Amateur Photographer” reviewed the Norita with standard lens and plain prism in its issue dated 27th October 1971, and reviewed the 40mm, 55mm, 160mm and 240mm lenses the following week (3rd November 1971).  While it went out of its way to welcome the system and be positive where possible, it is clear that many of the lenses produced images that were not very sharp, especially at the larger apertures, and revealed problems with flare.

Lenses from other manufacturers

Two reasons contributed to there being very few lenses from other manufacturers offered for the Norita/Rittreck:


However, that remarkable lens manufacturer, Kilfitt of Munich (which subsequently became the Zoomar company), did offer a Norita mount for at least some of its Medium Format lenses.

I am grateful to John, who told me in January 2016:

There are at least 4 very rare Zoomar lenses with Norita mounts and/or Killfit Zoomar adapters.

1 – Zoomar 170-320 zoom lens


 2 – Zoomar 250/4 mirror lens – can be adapted to Norita

3 – Zoomar 500/5.6 mirror lens –which you picture in your Pentacon Six reviews [here] – a Norita adapter exists

4 – Zoomar 1,000/8 mirror lens – I own this lens in C mount + a Norita adapter.

Thank you, John!

In December 2016 I heard from Jonathan, who told me:

I just wanted you to know that in addition to the other Kilar lenses your friend told you about, I also had a 90mm Macro-Kilar in Norita mount. Maybe it was spelled Makro-Kilar, I can't remember. I think it was F2.8. It focused from infinity to 1:1 with multiple telescoping helical tubes to get there. Aperture was totally manual. I didn't use it much because it wasn't very sharp, even stopped down.

My wife and I really loved the two bodies and six Noritar lenses. We shot a lot of weddings with them, and some of my favorite photos from the 1970s and 1980s were taken with them.

Thank you, Jonathan, for this interesting information.    Visitors to this page can read a review of the Macro-Kilar/Makro-Kilar (on a Pentacon Six, naturally!) here.

In April 2017 John sent me some more information:

  I just acquired a Graflec Norita brochure listing the standard 40, 55, 70, 80, 160, and 240mm Noritar lenses.

In addition - Accessory lenses available for Graflex Norita cameras - called Graflex/Zoomar:

90mm, f/2.8 Super Macro-Kilar f/2.8 - f/32 closest focus 5 1/2"
300mm, f/4 Pan-Tele-Kilar Pano  f/4 - f/32  closest focus 5 1/2'
300mm, f/4 Pan-Tele-Kilar Panso — with focusing lever f/4 - f/32 closest focus 4 1/2'
500mm, f/5.6 Sport Reflector        — with focusing lever f/5.6  closest focus 18'
1000mm, f/8 Sport Reflector         — with focusing lever f/8     closest focus 30’

Other Accessories listed:

Waist Level finder
Auto extension tubes (set of 3) - for Noritar 40mm to Zoomar 300mm
Pentaprism with Meter
Graflex Norita Copy Stand

Corrective Diopters (availability to be announced)
Microscope Attachment w/o shutter (availability to be announced)
Microscope Attachment with shutter (availability to be announced)

In this brochure Graflex offered a two year warranty on all cameras, lenses, and accessories from date of purchase.

John, thank you for this further information.  The lenses here called Graflex/Zoomar were previously sold under the name Kilfitt.  Kilfitt provided camera mounts for a wide range of cameras, so it is clear that a mount for Norita cameras was produced.  The one mount would apparently have fitted onto the mount base of all these lenses, which in most cases would have been a WE base, although many of these lenses were previously produced with the AN base.  I have updated my introduction to Kilfitt lenses, with information on the interchangeable camera mounts.  See that here.  Patrice-Hervé Pont’s book, which is referred to there, reports (p. 49) that the mount for Norita/Rittreck cameras had the code WERI.

Like most lenses designed in the 1950s or early 1960s, most if not all Kilfitt lenses designed for Medium Format cameras do not have any sort of auto-aperture mechanism, and this is the case with the 170-320mm Zoomar, which is reviewed with a Praktisix/Pentacon Six mount here.  Naturally, mirror lenses cannot be stopped down anyway.  Of course, in the 1950s and 1960s most Medium Format cameras did not have any mechanism to stop down lenses, so there just was not a need for lens manufacturers to incorporate any sort of auto-aperture mechanism.  In fact, the Praktisix was one of the first Medium Format SLRs with a mechanism to stop down the aperture of the lens automatically.


The Novoflex lenses for Medium Format cameras were available for many medium format cameras with focal plane shutters.  See the report on these lenses, in the Praktisix/Pentacon Six mount, starting here.  These lenses consisted principally of two components: a focussing mount which was known as the "PIGRIFF" and the two Medium Format Noflexar lens heads, the 240mm and the 500mm, which needed to be inserted into the PIGRIFF.  In February 2016 Martin Grahl, who is the Sales Manager at Novoflex, wrote to tell me that "The PIGRIFF 6×6 was available only briefly with the Norita breech lock bayonet mount in the mid 1970s".

Here is a copy of the relevant page of the Novoflex price list from 1975, which Martin e-mailed to me:

Thank you, Martin, for this information!

And here is a rear view of the PIGRIFF, clearly showing the Norita mount!

The PIGRIFF here has the 240mm lens head in place.
It is here mounted on a display stand.
This superb picture was taken in 2016 by the Novoflex staff photographer.
Reproduced by permission.

The accessories

Very few accessories were ever produced for the Norita.  I am only aware of the following:

In a Norita brochure I have recently seen However, I have never seen any of these three items for sale, and conclude that at best they must be extremely rare.  They may even enter into the category of items that were advertised but never entered serial production, not uncommon with camera manufacturers, as will be clear from other parts of this website!

There were no bellows (unless someone can prove me wrong, and I have been looking for years!)
There were no 2× converters, additional focussing aids or other accessories.

[C418-29A]  A comprehensive Norita outfit:

At the back: the ever-ready case (which won’t fit the camera because of the strap lugs!) and to its right the metering and non-metering prisms
In the next row: the rather awkward carrying cradle, the 240mm lens, a Norita body with standard lens and the rare waist-level finder in place, with the extended shutter speed dial for the metering prism protruding up above everything.  Then comes the 70mm leaf-shutter lens, followed by the 160mm lens, and on the right the set of 3 auto extension tubes.
Next row: the 40mm lens in front of the carrying cradle, and the 55mm lens between the 240 and the body, then various lens caps.
The “mystery ring” in front of the largest lens cap is described on the next page, here.
Virtually nothing is missing from this shot: just the super-rare and hyper-expensive 400mm lens, some lens shades and the extremely rare microscope adapters.

For variety of lenses and accessories, this outfit does not compare well with the outfits on offer from:

Pentacon Six outfit

Kiev 60 outfit


Exakta 66 outfit

In fact, the comparison is overly favourable to the Norita, since a non-Norita item is included in the Norita outfit shot, and various items are missing from the photos of the other three outfits: Cases, lens caps and lens hoods (shades) from the Pentacon Six and Kiev 60 outfits, plus specialised focussing screens for the Pentacon Six.  More focussing screens were available for the Exakta 66, plus more macro lenses and the elusive tilt-shift Super-Angulon.  What’s more, of course, the lenses and most of the accessories from each of these three systems can also be mounted on the other two cameras!  Of course, the Exakta 66 was not available in the 1970s when I took my decision, and little was known about the Kiev 60 in the West, but the Pentacon Six outfit with its lenses from Carl Zeiss Jena, Meyer-Optik and many other manufacturers was readily available.

Most important, there was always a niggling doubt about the design and the quality of the Norita range.  In my limited experience, this appears to have some basis in fact.  A few years ago I bought the Norita extension tubes.  For some strange reason, however the three tubes are combined, there are gaps in the range – certain magnifications that are just not possible, no matter how much you adjust the focussing ring of the lens.  This is just carelessness at the design stage.

Further, the aperture pin in Norita lenses moves sideways, as with some other cameras, but unlike the in-out movement of the pin on Pentacon Six lenses.  In order to transfer this sideways motion with the tubes, the designers have resorted to a double-tube construction, with an inner tube and and outer tube.  Firstly, this makes the tubes extremely heavy.  The three Norita tubes weigh 545 grams or 1lb 3¼ oz, while the four Pentacon Six tubes weigh little more than half this, at 330 grams or 11½  oz.
Secondly, the inner and outer tubes are in contact at many points, which results in friction when the inner tube is called upon to rotate and stop down the lens diaphragm.  Ball-bearings between the inner and outer tubes are designed to minimise friction, but I found the movement was not smooth, and do not doubt that on many occasions the lens will not have stopped down to the desired aperture by the time the shutter fires.

Worse, even though the tubes appeared new and unused, one day when I was trying them out, there was a grating noise, and all the ball-bearings fell out of one of the tubes, which is now useless!  I shall have to see if my repairer is prepared to take a look at it.  In contrast, the Pentacon Six tube design is simple and light-weight.  Above all, it just works without problems, year after year.

The ball bearings from a Norita close-up tube

Update, July 2008
My regular Pentacon Six technician, Tom Page, agreed to have a look at the faulty Norita tubes.  He was not impressed with the design.  Only one ball race in each of the tubes, even the longest one, means that movement is not as smooth as it should be.  After lubricating and replacing the ball bearings, he sealed the locking ring, aiming to make it tight enough to prevent the ball bearings getting out again, but not so tight that it would slow down the rotation of the inner tube that stops down the aperture.  Long-term reliability does not appear likely with this design.

Rittreck/Warner 66 Differences from Norita/Graflex Norita

John, who wrote to me in January 2016, also gave me the following information:

“I would point out the superiority of the Rittreck/Warner designs over the later Norita/Graflex Norita:

1- Earlier cameras both had mirror lockup while the later versions did not.

2 - The chrome trim on the earlier versions totally prevents the wear to the black finish of the later models.

3 - An adapter maker continues to tell me that he will produce an adapter allowing the use of Pentacon mount lenses on the Rittreck/Warner/Norita.

I shoot Rittreck and Warner cameras, but practically never the later editions.”

Thank you again, John!

My decision

I took the decision to go for the Pentacon Six in 1977 for the following reasons:

I have not regretted that decision since, and what we know now confirms that it was right (for me and many other users, at least): The Norita was clearly inspired by the Praktisix/Pentacon Six.  It did not succeed, in my opinion, because people who wanted a Medium Format SLR in enlarged 35mm style, but didn’t want to buy a product from communist East Germany, went for an alternative Japanese model: the Pentax 6×7. Why didn’t I?

To see a brief overview of the Pentax 6×7, compared to the Pentacon Six, click the following link.
Pentax 6×7

To see more information on the “mystery ring” in the Norita outfit picture, click here.

To return to the section on the pentaprisms, click here.

To return to the Frequently-asked Questions, click here.

To go back to the introduction to the cameras, click here.

To return to the interview with the author, click here.


© TRA November 2005.  Latest revision: March 2019